Is it really the result we want when a man with a hot cat was sent to a wreath in his hometown?

Pet 9:25am, 19 September 2025 111

The development of things is similar to what I expected. The guy who was sent to the hot search for abuse of cats with boiling water is being violent on the Internet.

Let's first review how things happened.

01

"Look at how miserable it is, aren't you afraid of committing evil?"

A few days ago, everyone had been praying for a cat, hoping that it could survive, but unfortunately it still couldn't survive. After all, the cat star accompanied its four children who had died of birth.

The person who killed it was a Shanxi man. The reason was that he was scratched by the cat while teasing him. In the atmosphere, the cat was locked into an iron cage of mice and watered it with the boiling water just now. Watching the cat wailing and struggling, he smiled grimly.

If it were not for the caring person passing by, the cat might be abused to death by the man with boiling water. But even if it was stopped by passers-by, the cat was dying and was burned to death...

The kind-hearted person called the police to rescue the abused cat and sent it to the pet hospital for treatment. Only when he found that there were four formed kittens in the cat's belly, all of which had died during the abuse. Although the doctors tried their best to rescue them and many netizens cheered up, the female cat was still too seriously injured and her body temperature continued to rise.

How cruel and cold-blooded a person will do something like abuse in the street? Whether it is a self-raising cat or a stray cat, those are all five lives! No one knows how extraordinary things such a person can do in front of life.

Although the man was taken away by the police after the incident, he could not be punished too severely due to the gap in animal protection laws. The public has no other way except to condemn him morally.

Sure enough, the punishment the man received in the end was only verbal criticism! The only thing that makes netizens feel better is that the man’s work unit makes the decision to resolve the labor relationship.

Countering violence with violence is never the result we want

There is nothing to say. Every time something similar happens, the abuser will face a round of cyber violence! The "messengers of justice" behind the network cable call it "violence to fight violence and complain directly. After the incident, the cat abuser began to receive wreaths and shrouds in his hometown. It is said that he could receive more than 200 wreaths a day... However, the cat abuser is not usually in his hometown, and only grandparents in his hometown are over 70 years old...

Some people may say that they deserve it!

However, how moral is the behavior of sending wreaths than cat abuse? Think about it, what are the two old men in the whole matter? Why do they have to bear the anger of netizens? If they are sick by netizens' actions, who can bear the consequences? In the face of online violence, they are also weak people who cannot protect themselves and the children in their stomachs, just like cats.

Furthermore, sending wreaths is already a serious violation. You may feel frustrated and unfair, but the fact is that it is not illegal to abuse a cat to death, and sending a wreath is a violation of the law. The crimes of illegal intimidation and insults are enough to sentence half a year.

What's more excessive is that in the eyes of those "extremely hate animal lovers", these people who send wreaths are representatives of all pet lovers, and their qualities are the quality of the entire pet lover. How did the label of "dog lover" come from? It was originally just a label that represents interests and hobbies, but it has become a derogatory term by these man-made disasters.

Using violence with violence not only cannot achieve the effect of violence, but will breed more serious violence and consequences, which is by no means the result we want.

03

CCTV called for legislation

For this matter, what ordinary people can do is actually only morally condemn abusers and call for anti-animal abuse legislation. It is worth being happy that CCTV also called for legislation as soon as possible to prohibit animal cruelty, which allows us to see the possibility of the future.

Why should we promote the anti-animal cruelty law?

CCTV said that legislation protects not only animals but ourselves. Granted, do you know how strong the correlation is between animal cruelty and violent crime? You will be surprised by the data given by a research report from the New York Humanitarian Association!

1. In Canada, 70% of criminals start with animal abuse; 2. In South Africa, 63% of criminals start with animal abuse; 3. In Australia, 95% of criminals murder, rape, violent beating, theft and drug abuse have a history of animal abuse 4. In the South Pacific: 62% of criminals are beaten, 90% of violent, property destruction and drugs are committed in a comprehensive crime, and 100% of sexual offenders have a history of animal abuse; 5. In the United States, 63% of criminals commit violent crimes, and 70% of criminals commit violent, theft, drugs and disorderly behaviors have a history of animal abuse.

Simply put, the correlation between violent crime and animal cruelty is as high as 70%! You can understand this way that a person who has committed animal abuse, as long as he has enough ability and the time is ripe, he is likely to point the abuse at humans themselves.

A person, after suffering any punishment or consequences after animal cruelty, and no one pointed out that this is wrong, the next step is most likely to be violent crime.

The greatest significance of anti-animal cruelty legislation lies in this, creating a society with less possibility of crime and a society with less violence, not only protecting animals, but also protecting each of us.

04

legislation is not difficult, why hasn't it been established for a long time?

In fact, it is not that our country does not have relevant laws on protecting animals, but that it has been there very long ago!

Around the 21st century BC, Dayu issued a ban: In March of summer, the rivers and lakes did not enter the net, so that they could grow into fish and turtles. This is probably the earliest relevant law to protect animals in human history.

During the modern Republic of China, the Nanjing government also promulgated China's first animal protection regulations, "Nanjing City's Implementation Rules for Prohibition of Animal Malice". The rules were at the forefront of the world at that time and solved the domestic animal abuse problem based on national conditions.

From this we can see that the idea of ​​protecting animals has a long history in our country, and it seems that legislation is not difficult, but why has it been delayed?

The most difficult thing in anti-animal abuse legislation is actually how to define abuse.

What is abuse? What level of abuse is considered? China is a big meat-eating country, so is slaughtering pigs, cattle and sheep considered abuse? If you really want to be serious, is the training of working dogs such as police dogs, guide dogs, search and rescue dogs considered abuse?

I saw a news story before that a French vagabond took a dog that depended on him on the roadside. As a result, several people came to the animal welfare organization that claimed to be Cause Animal Nord and violently snatched the vagabond's dog away. The tramp struggled hard, crying and begging them not to take their dogs away, the scene was heartbreaking.

However, the dog was still taken away. After that, the animal welfare organization posted photos of the dog on social media, and attached the text: The dog rescued today.

We cannot get the answer to what kind of life a dog wants, but who can define it as a life that is not full or warm when living a homeless life without food or clothing?

Law legislation is not difficult, and how to enforce the law is the real difficulty.

Unfortunately, this is also the fundamental reason why people like hot cat men can still be separated from the law.